So, been thinking about the Ram 2500 vs 3500, right? The 2500’s more compact, easier to park, and not as thirsty on gas. But the 3500’s got more power when towing. I towed a small camper with the 2500 once, barely felt the strain. And the 3500 took my bigger trailer like nothing. The 2500’s roomier too, or at least felt that way when I hauled my gear. Which one do you find better for your needs? Also can think the 3500 might be too big for city driving. Thoughts?
I’ve gotta say, rocking the Ram 2500 out in Texas, it’s a beast for daily hauls, not too bulky. But when I lived up north in Canada, I switched to the Ram 3500 for those heavy-duty jobs on the farm. This bad boy’s got more power and torque – seriously upgrades for hauling shitload loads. Great ride, but man, that fuel bill is heaping! Gotta choose based on yur needs, ya know?
I’ve been truckin’ around Southern California with both the Ram 2500 and 3500. The 2500’s solid for daily grind, decent hauling with ease. The 3500 though, it’s beast mode—tough as nails for heavy loads. Truck tonnage on a mission? 3500 is the go-to. Changed gear on me, more than I thought it would. Quite a ride either way!
I’ve got memories from Indiana, where the local mechanic recommended a Ram 3500 for heavy-duty hauling over the Ram 2500. More power and payload makes the diff clear. The 3500 shines when you’re pulling big trailers or hauling a massive load. Yeah, it’s pricier, but man, the reliability on long trips is something else!
I’ve seen both drives up in Canada. The 3500’s got more grunt and space, but RAM 2500’s still killer on highways! Feels like a beast either way, just depends what you really need for hauling. Engine horsepower differences make it obvious!
I’ve seen some big choices between Ram 2500 and 3500 here in Texas. The 2500’s solid for everyday, while the 3500’s beast mode with more torque, massive towing. You lookin’ for speed, might need the 3500. I ve noticed folks sticking with 2500 for practicality, though. Personal choice tho!
I’ve driven both in Texas - 2500’s solid, but the 3500’s beast mode for towing, space, and power. Perfect for big rigs and heavy duty. Love 'em both tho.
I’ve been crossin’ the Rockies in both a Ram 2500 and a 3500. The 2500’s handling’s solid for daily use, but the 3500? It’s beast mode when loaded, crushin’ loads like a champ! Decent ride on the highway, just needs more beef for serious haulin’. Definitely depends on what ya need trading Drake for work or play—tailor your ride!
I’ve been behind the wheel of both the Ram 2500 and Ram 3500 downstate in Michigan. The 2500 is solid for everyday hauling, easy to maneuver. But the 3500, with more power and payload, takes things up a notch—you’re talking serious business. It’s like night and day when hitting those long hauls. If you can swing it, the 3500 ain’t shabby at all. Just depends on your needs!
I’ve been driving from Chicago to Toronto, and the choice between a Ram 2500 and a Ram 3500 is key! The 2500’s lighter, smoother ride suits city and suburban trips, while the 3500 has that beast mode for tougher, off-road journeys. Power, towing, and payload capacity make the 3500 king of the road for heavy duty stuff. Decisions, decisions!
I’ve been drivin’ both, lived in Texas for a while. The 3500’s got more torque, pulls heavier loads like a champ. But 2500’s great for daily hauls. Feels like you’re cruisin’ on a cloud—definitely consider your needs before choosin’!
Living in Texas, I’ve driven both Ram 2500 and Ram 3500 trucks, and man, the differences are wild. The 2500’s nimble for quick errands, but the 3500 is a beast for heavy duty hauling. They say bigger isn’t always better, but for towing heavy trailers or moving cattle, the 3500’s extra power and space are irreplaceable. Plus, the suspension on the 3500? Oh man, you can tell when it’s handling a tough load, and that’s some strong truck talk right there.
I’ve driven the Ram 2500 in midwest USA, strong for family trips. The Ram 3500 I’ve seen up north Canada, and man, they’re beasts for towing and hauling! Love both, but for work n’ heavy duty, 3500 packs the punch. Sidebar, neither’s a compact dream!
In Toronto last summer, I finally got my hands on a Ram. The 2500’s great for towing my boat—handles smooth till you push it too hard. Buut, the 3500’s arm candy for heavy hauling. My buddy swears by it for his heavy-duty jobs with its big ol’ turbo. I’ve grown to love the 2500 for everyday use but wouldn’t turn down a 3500 if I needed that extra vroom vroom. Both beasts, really depends on what ya need, ya feel me?
Growing up in Texas, I’ve had experience with both Ram 2500 and 3500 trucks. The 2500 is solid for everyday tasks, but when it comes to heavy-duty hauling or towing, the 3500’s got my back. It’s definitely pricier, but the torque in that beast is unreal. I love the beds on both, but if convenience isn’t an issue, the 3500’s got everything you could ever want in a work truck. Back in yore days, my dad chose 3500 for those long farm expeditions—if he didn’t, we’d have been stuck.
I’ve been with an 2500 in Cali, always been solid for my moving gigs. But after testin’ a 3500 down in TX, it’s like night & day—more towing power, luxury, & space. Definitely depends on what you’re after, but the 3500’s a heavyweight champ in my books.
I’ve got some backstory from Los Angeles—been eyein’ both the Ram 2500 and 3500 trucks. Ram 3500 really pulls heavy duty; it’s like a beast with all them extra engine options and payload capacity. But 2500 ain’t slouchin’, especially if ya prefer comfort n more luxury vibes. Fair commutes to the dealership ain’t my jam. For serious towing, though? 3500 gets my vote every time!
Just drove both in Texas highways – talk about horsepower dreams vs practicality. The Ram 2500’s nimble; perfect for city errands and smaller projects. But when I could haul two pretty hefty loads back-to-back, the Ram 3500 outshined. The beefier engine and bed space mean nothing’s too big, while the tech inside feels worth every extra dollar! Definitely consider your needs, man!